filthy bitches gun club's topics - tribe.net

SCOTUS affirms individual right to keep and bear firearms

Sasquatch — Fri, 27 Jun 2008 04:48:16 GMT

""In one of the most significant constitutional rulings handed down in many years, the Supreme Court, by a 5-4 vote, has ruled that individual Americans have a right to protect themselves with a firearm under the 2nd Amendment."

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2008/06/huge_scotus_victory_for_gun_ri.html

San Fransisco, you're reckoning is come. Taking rights for PC reasons bites.

Posting this in the other gun tribes too.

Sas

posted in filthy bitches gun club - 0 replies

CA Appeals Court finds SF Handgun Ban Illegal

Sasquatch — Thu, 10 Jan 2008 05:47:50 GMT

CA Appeals Court finds SF Handgun Ban Illegal.

Of course, the nannystatists overseers of San Francisco KNEW that state law trumped their little ordinance from the start so the money they just wasted fighting this appeal could have gone to so many other more useful needs were it not for their Cranial Inversion with regard to an individuals right to possess and carry a firearm.

http://www.saf.org/viewpr-new.asp?id=254

Posting this on my other two gun rights tribes as well.

Sas

posted in filthy bitches gun club - 0 replies

More legislation coming due to VT killer attention whore

Sasquatch — Fri, 27 Apr 2007 19:29:36 GMT

Please forgive me if you've already heard this or are tired of these lenghty forwards. I hesitate to change their original form to avoid the appearance of spinning the spin : ). I'll be posting this to rifles and pistols tribe as well.

Congressional Leaders Moving To Pass Gun Control Without A Vote!
-- McCarthy bill would treat gun owners even worse than terrorists

Gun Owners of America E-Mail Alert
8001 Forbes Place, Suite 102, Springfield, VA 22151
Phone: 703-321-8585 / FAX: 703-321-8408
http://www.gunowners.org/ordergoamem.htm

"Another gun rights group, the Gun Owners of America, is adamantly
opposed to the [McCarthy-Dingell] legislation. It said the measure
would allow the government to trample privacy rights by compiling
reams of personal information and potentially bar mentally stable
people from buying guns." -- Associated Press, April 24, 2007

Thursday, April 26, 2007

This is going to be a knock-down, drag-out fight. GOA continues to
stand alone in the trenches, defending the rights of gun owners
around the country. It's not going to be easy.

Gun control supporters want to pass gun control within the next
couple of weeks. And that's why, even if you took action earlier
this week, you need to do so once again.

All the gun haters (who have been keeping silent for a while) are now
coming out of the closet and into the open. Take the notoriously
anti-gun senator from New York -- Chuck Schumer. He has been very,
very excited this week. Recent events have given him a platform, and
the excuse, to push legislation that he had sponsored years ago --
legislation that never got through Congress.

You see, Senator Chuck Schumer has been, in past years, the Senate
sponsor of the McCarthy bill (HR 297). And the recent murders at
Virginia Tech have given Senator Schumer the pretext he has been
looking for. Appearing on the Bill O'Reilly show earlier this week,
Schumer did his best to make a reasonable-sounding pitch for more gun
control.

He told O'Reilly on Monday that while he and Rep. McCarthy had
previously worked together on this legislation, he now wants Congress
to take up HR 297 quickly. "The Brady Law is a reasonable
limitation," Schumer said. "Some might disagree with me, but I think
certain kinds of licensing and registration is a reasonable
limitation. We do it for cars."

Get the picture? First, he wants the Brady Law strengthened with the
McCarthy-Dingell-Schumer legislation. Then it's off to pass more gun
control -- treating guns like cars, where all gun owners are licensed
and where bureaucrats will have a wonderful confiscation list.

In the O'Reilly interview, Schumer showed his hand when he revealed
the strategy for this bill. Because it could become such a hot
potato -- thanks to your efforts -- Senator Schumer is pushing to get
this bill passed by Unanimous Consent in the Senate, which basically
means that the bill would get passed WITHOUT A VOTE.

This is a perfect way to pass gun control without anyone getting
blamed... or so they think. We need to tell every Senator that if
this bill passes without a vote, then we hold ALL OF THEM
responsible. (Be looking for a future GOA alert aimed at your
Senators.)

On the House side, the Associated Press reported this past Monday
that "House Democratic leaders are working with the National Rifle
Association to bolster existing laws blocking" certain prohibited
persons from buying guns. Of course, there are at least three
problems with this approach:

1. It's morally and constitutionally wrong to require law-abiding
citizens to first prove their innocence to the government before they
can exercise their rights -- whether it's Second Amendment rights,
First Amendment rights, or any other right. Doing that gives
bureaucrats the opportunity to abuse their power and illegitimately
prevent honest gun owners from buying guns.

2. Bureaucrats have already used the Brady Law to illegitimately deny
the Second Amendment rights of innocent Americans. Americans have
been prevented from buying guns because of outstanding traffic
tickets, because of errors, because the NICS computer system has
crashed -- and don't forget returning veterans because of
combat-related stress. You give an anti-gun bureaucrat an inch,
he'll take a mile -- which we have already seen as GOA has documented
numerous instances of the abuses mentioned above.

3. Finally, all the background checks in the world will NOT stop bad
guys from getting firearms. As we mentioned in the previous alert,
severe restrictions in Washington, DC, England, Canada, Germany and
other places have not stopped evil people from using guns to commit
murder. (Correction: In our previous alert, we incorrectly
identified Ireland as the location of the infamous schoolyard
massacre. In fact, it took place in Dunblane, Scotland in 1996 -- a
country which at the time had even more stringent laws than we have
here.)

McCARTHY BILL TREATING GUN OWNERS WORSE THAN TERRORISTS

HR 297 would require the states to turn over mountains of personal
data (on people like you) to the FBI -- any information which
according to the Attorney General, in his or her unilateral
discretion, would be useful in ascertaining who is or is not a
"prohibited person."

Liberal support for this bill points out an interesting hypocrisy in
their loyalties: For six years, congressional Democrats have
complained about the Bush administration's efforts to obtain personal
information on suspected terrorists WITHOUT A COURT ORDER.

And yet, this bill would allow the FBI to obtain massive amounts of
information -- information which dwarfs any records obtained from
warrantless searches (or wiretaps) that have been conducted by the
Bush Administration on known or suspected terrorists operating in the
country.

In fact, HR 297 would allow the FBI to get this information on honest
Americans (like you) even though the required data is much more
private and personal than any information obtained thus far by the
Bush administration on terrorists.

And all of these personal records would be obtained by the FBI with
no warrant or judicial or Congressional oversight whatsoever!!!

Get the picture? Spying on terrorists is bad... but spying on honest
gun owners is good. After all, this horrific intrusion on the
private lives of all Americans is presumed to be "okay" because it's
only being used to bash guns, not to go after terrorists and
criminals who are trying to kill us.

As indicated in earlier alerts, this information could include your
medical, psychological, financial, education, employment, traffic,
state tax records and more. We don't even know the full extent of
what could be included because HR 297 -- which can be viewed at
http://thomas.loc.gov by typing in the bill number -- is so
open-ended. It requires states to provide the NICS system with ALL
RECORDS that the Attorney General believes will help the FBI
determine who is and who is not a prohibited person. Certainly, an
anti-gun AG like Janet Reno would want as many types of records in
the system as possible.

The provision that would probably lead to the greatest number of
'fishing expeditions' is that related to illegal aliens. Federal law
prohibits illegal aliens from owning guns. The bill requires all
"relevant" data related to who is in this country illegally. But
what records pertaining to illegal aliens from the states would be
relevant? Perhaps a better question would be, what records are not
relevant?

ACTION:

1. Please take a moment to communicate your opposition to HR 297 --
even if you already sent your Representative a note earlier this
week. We have provided a new letter (below) which provides updated
information relating to the battle we are fighting.

House leaders are talking about bringing up this bill soon. And Sen.
Schumer (in his interview with O'Reilly) even hinted at the fact that
the bill could come up WITHOUT the ability to offer pro-gun
amendments -- such as a repeal of the DC gun ban or reciprocity for
concealed carry holders -- provisions that could potentially serve as
killer amendments.

Also -- oh yeah, this is going to upset you -- Senator Schumer told
O'Reilly, "I got to tell you, a lot of NRA people, they support
this." Can you believe that? Senator Schumer is claiming to speak
for you! That's why it's so important that you once again tell your
congressman that Schumer is wrong... that you're a supporter of gun
rights who OPPOSES the anti-gun McCarthy-Dingell bill.

2. Please circulate this e-mail and forward it to as many gun owners
as you can.

CONTACT INFORMATION: You can visit the Gun Owners Legislative Action
Center at http://www.gunowners.org/activism.htm to send your
Representative the pre-written e-mail message below. And, you can
call your Representative toll-free at 1-877-762-8762.

----- Pre-written letter -----

Dear Representative:

As a supporter of Second Amendment rights, I do NOT support HR 297,
the NICS Improvement Act. I hope that you will OPPOSE this bill and
urge your party leadership to either kill it outright or to allow
other pro-gun amendments to be offered (repeal of the DC gun ban,
reciprocity for concealed carry holders, etc.).

In its current form, HR 297 will treat gun owners even worse than
terrorists, giving the FBI a mountain of private information on
law-abiding Americans like me.

How is it that, despite all the criticism over the Bush
administration's attempts to obtain personal information on suspected
terrorists without a court order, this bill would allow the FBI to
obtain massive amounts of information on ME -- information which
dwarfs any warrantless searches (or wiretaps) that have been
conducted by the Bush Administration on known or suspected terrorists
operating in the country.

And all of this personal information would be obtained by the FBI
with no warrant or judicial or Congressional oversight whatsoever!!!

How is it that spying on terrorists is bad, but spying on honest gun
owners is good?

Again, I hope that you will oppose HR 297. Gun Owners of America
will continue to keep me informed on the progress of this bill.
Thank you.

Sincerely,

****************************
Streaming Video Update

It's an ongoing process of getting permissions, obtaining source
discs, and formatting files, but we are continuing to post videos of
GOA spokesmen on television as they become available. Please stop by
our streaming video section at http://www.gunowners.org/svtb.htm to
see what's new this week.

****************************

Please do not reply directly to this message, as your reply will
bounce back as undeliverable.

To subscribe to free, low-volume GOA alerts, go to
http://www.gunowners.org/ean.htm on the web. Change of e-mail
address may also be made at that location.

To unsubscribe send a message to
gunowners_list@capwiz.mailmanager.net with the word unsubscribe in
the subject line or use the url below.

Problems, questions or comments? The main GOA e-mail address
goamail@gunowners.org is at your disposal. Please do not add that
address to distribution lists sending more than ten messages per
week or lists associated with issues other than gun rights.

posted in filthy bitches gun club - 1 reply

Pending California Gun Legislation, take action or live with it.

Sasquatch — Sun, 15 Apr 2007 05:02:01 GMT

From the NRA...

"CALIFORNIA: California Legislative Update! Four bills
critical to gun owners in the Golden State will be
heard in the Assembly Public Safety Committee on
Tuesday, April 17. Assembly Bill 1471 would require
that after a certain date, the make, model, and serial
number be microstamped onto the interior surface or
internal working parts of all handguns in such a
manner that those identifiers are imprinted onto the
cartridge case upon firing. Also, Assembly Bill 362
would require identification be presented for all mail
order and face-to-face ammunition sales. However, not
all is bad in the Golden State. Assembly Bill 1645
will protect the Second Amendment rights of
Californians to keep and bear arms from executive
authority during a state of emergency in California.
Also, Assembly Bill 1105 would require the Department
of Justice to complete a study identifying what
actions would be required to reduce the waiting period
for firearms transfers in California. Please contact
the members of the Assembly Committee on Public Safety
at (916) 319-3744 and respectfully urge them to oppose
AB1471 and AB362, and to support AB1645 and AB1145."

http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/07-08/bill/asm/ab_1451-1500/ab_1471_bill_20070223_introduced.html
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/07-08/bill/asm/ab_0351-0400/ab_362_bill_20070214_introduced.html
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/07-08/bill/asm/ab_1601-1650/ab_1645_bill_20070223_introduced.html
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/07-08/bill/asm/ab_1101-1150/ab_1105_bill_20070223_introduced.html

"urge them to oppose AB1471 and AB362, and to support AB1645 and AB1145."

I will post this to the gun tribes I'm a member of.

Sas

posted in filthy bitches gun club - 2 replies

Penn and Teller for President

Sasquatch — Fri, 14 Apr 2006 03:45:10 GMT

Penn and Teller have made a video on gun rights. I think you'll agree with me when I say these guys are my heroes.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5001380249576962921&q=bullshit&pl=true

I'm posting this to the other gun tribes I'm a member of as well.

Sas

posted in filthy bitches gun club - 3 replies

What Happens When Citizens Guns Are Taken Away

db_cooper — Sat, 10 Dec 2005 04:15:56 GMT

From Ed Chenel
Australian Police Officer
12-9-5

Hi Yanks and Canadians - I thought you all would like to see the real figures from Down Under. It has now been 12 months since gun owners in Australia were forced by a new law to surrender 640,381 personal firearms to be destroyed by our own government, a program costing Australia taxpayers more than $500 million dollars.

The first year results are now in: Australia-wide, homicides are up 3.2 percent, Australia-wide, assaults are up 8.6 percent; Australia-wide, armed robberies are up 44 percent (yes, 44 percent)! In the state of Victoria alone, homicides with firearms are now up 300 percent.

Note that while the law-abiding citizens turned them in, the criminals did not! (And criminals still possess their guns!)

While figures over the previous 25 years showed a steady decrease in armed robbery with firearms, this has changed drastically upward in the past 12 months, since the criminals now are guaranteed that their prey is unarmed. There has also been a dramatic increase in break-ins and assaults of the elderly.

Australian politicians are at a loss to explain how public safety has decreased, after such monumental effort and expense was expended in successfully ridding Australian society of guns. You won't see this on the American /Canadian evening news or hear your government or members of the State Assembly amd Ottawa parliament disseminating this information.

The Australian experience proves it.

Guns in the hands of honest citizens save lives and property and, yes, gun-control laws affect only the law-abiding public.

Take note Americans and Canadians before it's too late.

MainPage
http://www.rense.com

http://www.rense.com/general69/guns.htm

posted in filthy bitches gun club - 8 replies

THEY can have my guns. Bullets first.

TODDROYALLCASPELL — Fri, 16 Jun 2006 15:34:25 GMT

Thank you NRA. I love SF and go unarmed but then I am 6'3" and 230 # NOT a target. If I was a 5 foot nothing cute girl I would pack everyday. Just look how fucked up London is after they took the guns from everyone but the criminals. A determined criminal will allways be able to find a hot piece and god help you if they KNOW you aint got one. A armed society is a polite society.

San Francisco Superior Court Rejects Gun Ban;
2nd Amendment Upheld
NRA Statement on Latest Developments

Yesterday, San Francisco Superior Court Judge James Warren struck down the San Francisco handgun ban, asserting that under California law local officials do not have the authority to ban firearms from law-abiding citizens. The National Rifle Association (NRA) opposed the ban from its inception.

NRA Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre stated, "This ruling is a major victory for freedom and for the National Rifle Association. Proposition H was an ill-conceived gun ban scheme that would have violated the rights of only the law-abiding in San Francisco. We fought this outrageous attack on the constitutional rights of the good guys and we prevailed. We are determined not to see this gross injustice happen again and will fight any effort by politicians to resurrect this faulty proposal."

The San Francisco gun ban would have prohibited law-abiding city residents from purchasing firearms - rifles, shotguns and handguns - for any lawful reason, whether for self-defense, hunting or recreational shooting. In addition, current law-abiding gun owners would have to surrender their registered handguns to the police.

Chris W. Cox, NRA chief lobbyist, stated, "We are pleased with the decision of Judge James Warren of the California Superior Court. In today's ruling, Judge Warren ruled California law prohibits a city or county from banning handgun possession by law-abiding adults. This ruling supports the premise of NRA's argument. The NRA filed it's lawsuit soon after Proposition H passed arguing that the proposition was in violation of California preemption laws that say firearm laws are regulated by the state."

The San Francisco Police Officers Association also opposed the ban, stating that the new law nullified "the personal choice of city residents to lawfully possess a handgun for self-defense purposes."

Cox continued, "It seems evident that the authors of this measure either intentionally misled voters during the election or authored this proposed measure with gross disregard of California law. Regrettably, the biggest losers were the voters in this municipality who had to bear the considerable financial burden to satisfy the careless political whim of their elected officials."

NRA and its Civil Rights Defense Fund presently support more than 60 cases involving the constitutional rights of gun owners. NRA filed a lawsuit challenging gun confiscations in the wake of Katrina (NRA v. New Orleans) and to clarify California's so-called "assault weapon" law (Hunt v. Lockyer). It successfully challenged the San Francisco gun ban (NRA v. San Francisco), and it is challenging seizures of firearms at New York and New Jersey airports contrary to federal safe passage law (John Torraco and William Winstanley in New York and Gregg Revell in New Jersey). Successes include striking down unconstitutional laws in Wisconsin (State v. Hamdan), New Mexico (Baca v. New Mexico Department of Public Safety), Oregon (State v. Dalgado), and West Virginia (State ex rel. City of Princeton v. Buckner). NRA also supported cases involving successful self-defense, for example, Jeffrey Kinder, Sr., and Jeffrey Kinder III (Arizona) and Tracey Roberts (Iowa).

--nra--

NRA Statement on Latest Developments in San Francisco Gun Ban

Established in 1871, the National Rifle Association is America's oldest civil rights and sportsmen's group. Four million members strong, NRA continues its mission to uphold Second Amendment rights and to advocate enforcement of existing laws against violent offenders to reduce crime. The Association remains the nation's leader in firearm education and training for law-abiding gun owners, law enforcement and the armed services.

posted in filthy bitches gun club - 0 replies

so how many of you filthy bitches in SF have turned in your guns?

PBR — Fri, 30 Dec 2005 11:01:24 GMT

so how many of you filthy bitches in SF have turned in your guns?
I am just curious as to how everyone in SF has reacted to the recent legislation on handguns.

posted in filthy bitches gun club - 6 replies

Miniguns of all types

Sasquatch — Tue, 28 Feb 2006 06:57:46 GMT

Miniguns galore at http://www.montysminiguns.com/. Bullets, BB's, paint balls, replicas, Movie props and Airsoft models. Airsoft Miniguns? Scary fun. I wonder if you can juice up the air ones to a decent FPS?

http://www.montysminiguns.com/

Sas

posted in filthy bitches gun club - 0 replies

shotgun recommendations

violetblue — Wed, 09 Nov 2005 19:30:14 GMT

this handgun thing is reminding me that I've wanted a new shotgun for a long time. anyone have recommendations, styles they prefer? anything is helpful!

xoxo

posted in filthy bitches gun club - 21 replies

against my wishes

violetblue — Wed, 21 Dec 2005 23:12:56 GMT

we've been made a private tribe.

my anger is here:

http://www.fleshbot.com/sex/news/tribes-black-tuesday-144122.php

http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2005/12/the_tribenet_22.html

posted in filthy bitches gun club - 19 replies

PISSED OFF AT TRIBE.NET CENSORSHIP......

Fri, 06 Jan 2006 01:51:30 GMT

Hey ppl so here's the lovely email I just sent to the boys and girls at the feedback site here on tribe.....

Ok so you guys have just taken the fun out of even being a member with tribe.net..... what's the point in sending pointless emails about how the law says that certain photos are pornographic and so on when your site has more sexually explicit content than any other site on the web. GROW SOME BALLS!!!!!! Let the members keep their photos on as they were before without having to PISS THEM ALL OFF by making us ALL have to manually set who can see the photos.This is why you have so many damn members, you DIPSHITS!!!!!!!!! BECAUSE YOU MADE GOD DAMN EASY TO SET UP WITHOUT ASININE BULLSHIT TO DEAL WITH....WHO THE HELL DO YOU THINK YOU ARE IN CENSORING PHOTOS OF DESERTS, CATS, SOME CHICKS ASS.....HAVEN'T YOU EVER HEARD OF SOMETHING CALLED THE FUCKING FIRST AMENDMENT......I FUCKING JUST GOT BACK FROM IRAQ AND FAUGHT FOR YOUR HAPPY ASS TO HAVE A FUCKING WEBSITE AND I'M A DAMN ANGRY CHICK!!!!!!!!! FOR CHRIST SAKES STRAP ON BALLS IF YOU DON'T HAVE ANY YOU DAMN LIBRAL DOUCHE BAGS

SINCERELY YOUR LORD AND MASTER,
LEIDA

posted in filthy bitches gun club - 2 replies

Dangerous women

Tue, 20 Dec 2005 01:57:53 GMT

Sweet

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/front/3525894.html

posted in filthy bitches gun club - 1 reply

write your senators - stop this one in it's tracks

db_cooper — Fri, 09 Dec 2005 01:34:20 GMT

BOHICA. bend over here it comes again. The assault weapons ban was just reintroduced again. Start writing the letters and sending the emails again. Remind them that this is an election year coming up.

Here is a link to the bill.
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/...gpUiCG:b61044:

> This is how he introduced it to the president.

> By Mr. LAUTENBERG (for himself, Mr. CORZINE, Mr. SCHUMER, Mrs. BOXER, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. DURBIN, Ms. MIKULSKI, Mr. SARBANES, Mr. REED, Mr. AKAKA, Mr. DODD, and Mrs. CLINTON):
>
> S. 645. A bill to reinstate the Public Safety and Recreational Firearms Use Protection Act; to the Committee on the Judiciary.
>
> Mr. LAUTENBERG. Mr. President, I rise to speak about a common sense bill that will protect American citizens and law enforcement officers. The Assault Weapons Ban and Law Enforcement Protection Act is designed to restore and strengthen the ban on assault weapons that expired on September 13, 2004.
>
> [Page: S2855] GPO's PDF The Government Accountability Office recently reported that 47 people on the terrorist watch list legally purchased firearms in this country last year. I personally believe that a person on the terrorist watch list, who isn't allowed to board a commercial airliner, should not be able to purchase any weapon. But they especially shouldn't be able to buy assault weapons, which possess unique, military-bred, anti-personnel design characteristics. These features, taken together, make it easy for a shooter to simply point a weapon--as opposed to taking careful aim--and quickly spray a wide area with a lethal hail of bullets.
>
> These features make assault weapons especially attractive to terrorists and criminals, and virtually useless to hunters or sport shooters.
>
> Before the previous ban on assault weapons expired last November, some attempted to justify that expiration by saying that it wasn't working as intended.
>
> That is true. Some gun manufacturers were exploiting loopholes in the law by selling kits that made it possible to modify legal firearms into assault-style weapons, or by changing a few features of a weapon so it would slip through the legal definition of an assault rifle. The proper response to these abuses was not to let the ban expire, however. Instead, we should have fixed the ban so it really kept assault-style weapons out of the hands of criminals and terrorists. This bill will do that.
>
> It improves and simplifies the definition of assault weapons; expands the scope of the ban to include conversion parts kits that can be purchased through the mail and used to build an assault weapon; regulates the transfer of grandfathered assault weapons; clarifies definitions of assault weapon characteristics; and enhances tracing of assault weapons.
>
> Keeping assault weapons out of the hands of terrorists and criminals is simply a matter of common sense. Innocent lives are at stake--including the lives of law enforcement officers who are our last line of defense against terrorists who would attack our communities. Make no mistake--military-style assault weapons are a threat to cops on the street.
>
> An analysis of FBI data found that one in five law enforcement officers slain in the line of duty between January 1, 1998, and December 31, 2001, were killed with assault weapons. How many of those officers would be alive today if criminals hadn't been able to get their hands on assault weapons?
>
> Hundreds of organizations are on record in support of a ban on assault weapons, including the Anti-Defamation League, Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence united with the Million Mom March, Consumer Federation of America, National Coalition Against Domestic Violence, National League of Cities, and Voices for America's Children. I urge all of my colleagues to support this common-sense measure.
>
> I ask unanimous consent that the text of the bill be printed in the RECORD.
>
> There being no objection, the bill was ordered to be printed in the RECORD, as follows:
>
> S. 645
>
> Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
>
> SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
>
> This Act may be cited as the ``Assault Weapons Ban and Law Enforcement Protection Act of 2005''.
>
> SEC. 2. RESTRICTION ON MANUFACTURE, TRANSFER, AND POSSESSION OF CERTAIN SEMIAUTOMATIC ASSAULT WEAPONS.
>
> (a) RESTRICTION.--Section 922 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding after subsection (u) the following:
>
> ``(v)(1) It shall be unlawful for a person to manufacture, transfer, or possess a semiautomatic assault weapon.
>
> ``(2) Paragraph (1) shall not apply to the possession or transfer of any semiautomatic assault weapon otherwise lawfully possessed under Federal law on the date of enactment of this subsection.
>
> ``(3) Paragraph (1) shall not apply to any firearm that--
>
> ``(A) is manually operated by bolt, pump, level, or slide action;
>
> ``(B) has been rendered permanently inoperable; or
>
> ``(C) is an antique firearm.
>
> ``(4) Paragraph (1) shall not apply to--
>
> ``(A) the manufacture for, transfer to, or possession by the United States or a department or agency of the United States or a State or a department, agency, or political subdivision of a State, or a transfer to or possession by a law enforcement officer employed by such an entity for purposes of law enforcement (whether on or off duty);
>
> ``(B) the transfer to a licensee under title I of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 for purposes of establishing and maintaining an onsite physical protection system and security organization required by Federal law, or possession by an employee or contractor of such licensee onsite for such purposes or off-site for purposes of licensee-authorized training or transportation of nuclear materials;
>
> ``(C) the possession, by an individual who is retired from service with a law enforcement agency and is not otherwise prohibited from receiving a firearm, of a semiautomatic assault weapon transferred to the individual by the agency upon such retirement; or
>
> ``(D) the manufacture, transfer, or possession of a semiautomatic assault weapon by a licensed manufacturer or licensed importer for the purposes of testing or experimentation authorized by the Secretary.
>
> ``(5) It shall be unlawful for any person to transfer a semiautomatic assault weapon to which paragraph (1) does not apply, except through--
>
> ``(A) a licensed dealer, and for purposes of subsection (t) in the case of such a transfer, the weapon shall be considered to be transferred from the business inventory of the licensed dealer and the dealer shall be considered to be the transferor; or
>
> ``(B) a State or local law enforcement agency if the transfer is made in accordance with the procedures provided for in subsection (t) of this section and section 923(g).
>
> ``(6) The Attorney General shall establish and maintain, in a timely manner, a record of the make, model, and date of manufacture of any semiautomatic assault weapon which the Attorney General is made aware has been used in relation to a crime under Federal or State law, and the nature and circumstances of the crime involved, including the outcome of relevant criminal investigations and proceedings. The Attorney General shall annually submit the record to Congress and make the record available to the general public.''.
>
> (b) DEFINITION OF SEMIAUTOMATIC ASSAULT WEAPON.--Section 921(a) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding after paragraph (29) the following:
>
> ``(30) The term `semiautomatic assault weapon' means any of the following:
>
> ``(A) RIFLES.--The following rifles or copies or duplicates thereof--
>
> ``(i) AK, AKM, AKS, AK-47, AK-74, ARM, MAK90, Misr, NHM 90, NHM 91, SA 85, SA 93, VEPR;
>
> ``(ii) AR-10;
>
> ``(iii) AR-15, Bushmaster XM15, Armalite M15, or Olympic Arms PCR;
>
> ``(iv) AR70;
>
> ``(v) Calico Liberty;
>
> ``(vi) Dragunov SVD Sniper Rifle or Dragunov SVU;
>
> ``(vii) Fabrique National FN/FAL, FN/LAR, or FNC;
>
> ``(viii) Hi-Point Carbine;
>
> ``(ix) HK-91, HK-93, HK-94, or HK-PSG-1;
>
> ``(x) Kel-Tec Sub Rifle;
>
> ``(xi) M1 Carbine;
>
> ``(xii) Saiga;
>
> ``(xiii) SAR-8, SAR-4800;
>
> ``(xiv) SKS with detachable magazine;
>
> ``(xv) SLG 95;
>
> ``(xvi) SLR 95 or 96;
>
> ``(xvii) Steyr AUG;
>
> ``(xviii) Sturm, Ruger Mini-14;
>
> ``(xix) Tavor;
>
> ``(xx) Thompson 1927, Thompson M1, or Thompson 1927 Commando; or
>
> ``(xxi) Uzi, Galil and Uzi Sporter, Galil Sporter, or Galil Sniper Rifle (Galatz).
>
> ``(B) PISTOLS.--The following pistols or copies or duplicates thereof--
>
> ``(i) Calico M-110;
>
> ``(ii) MAC-10, MAC-11, or MPA3;
>
> ``(iii) Olympic Arms OA;
>
> ``(iv) TEC-9, TEC-DC9, TEC-22 Scorpion, or AB-10; or
>
> ``(v) Uzi.
>
> ``(C) SHOTGUNS.--The following shotguns or copies or duplicates thereof--
>
> ``(i) Armscor 30 BG;
>
> ``(ii) SPAS 12 or LAW 12;
>
> ``(iii) Striker 12; or
>
> ``(iv) Streetsweeper.
>
> ``(D) DETACHABLE MAGAZINE RIFLES.--A semiautomatic rifle that has an ability to accept a detachable magazine, and that has--
>
> ``(i) a folding or telescoping stock;
>
> ``(ii) a threaded barrel;
>
> ``(iii) a pistol grip;
>
> ``(iv) a forward grip; or
>
> ``(v) a barrel shroud.
>
> ``(E) FIXED MAGAZINE RIFLES.--A semiautomatic rifle that has a fixed magazine with the capacity to accept more than 10 rounds, except for an attached tubular device designed to accept, and capable of operating only with, .22 caliber rimfire ammunition.
>
> ``(F) DETACHABLE MAGAZINE PISTOLS.--A semiautomatic pistol that has the ability to accept a detachable magazine, and has--
>
> ``(i) a second pistol grip;
>
> ``(ii) a threaded barrel;
>
> ``(iii) a barrel shroud; or
>
> ``(iv) the capacity to accept a detachable magazine at a location outside of the pistol grip.
>
> ``(G) FIXED MAGAZINE PISTOLS.--A semiautomatic pistol with a fixed magazine that has the capacity to accept more than 10 rounds.
>
> ``(H) SEMIAUTOMATIC SHOTGUNS.--A semiautomatic shotgun that has--
>
> ``(i) a folding or telescoping stock;
>
> ``(ii) a pistol grip;
>
> ``(iii) the ability to accept a detachable magazine; or
>
> ``(iv) a fixed magazine capacity of more than 5 rounds.
>
> ``(I) OTHER SHOTGUNS.--A shotgun with a revolving cylinder.
>
> ``(J) FRAMES OR RECEIVERS.--A frame or receiver that is identical to, or based substantially on the frame or receiver of, a firearm described in any of subparagraphs (A) through (I) or (L).
>
> ``(K) CONVERSION KITS.--A conversion kit.
>
> ``(L) MILITARY OR LAW ENFORCMENT WEAPONS.--A semiautomatic rifle or shotgun originally designed for military or law enforcement use, or a firearm based on the design of such a firearm, that is not particularly suitable for sporting purposes, as determined by the Attorney General. In making the determination, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that a firearm procured for use by the United States military or any Federal law enforcement agency is not particularly suitable for sporting purposes, and a firearm shall not be determined to be particularly suitable for sporting purposes solely because the firearm is suitable for use in a sporting event.''.
>
> (c) PENALTIES.--
>
> (1) VIOLATION OF SECTION 922(v).--Section 924(a)(1)(B) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by striking ``or (q) of section 922'' and inserting ``(r), or (v) of section 922''.
>
> (2) USE OR POSSESSION DURING CRIME OF VIOLENCE OR DRUG TRAFFICKING CRIME.--Section 924(c)(1)(B)(i) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by inserting ``or semiautomatic assault weapon,'' after ``short-barreled shotgun,''.
>
> (d) IDENTIFICATION MARKINGS FOR SEMIAUTOMATIC ASSAULT WEAPONS.--Section 923(i) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following: ``The serial number of any semiautomatic assault weapon manufactured after the date of the enactment of this sentence shall clearly show the date on which the weapon was manufactured.''.
>
> (e) RELATED DEFINITIONS.--Section 921(a) of such title is amended by adding at the end the following:
>
> ``(36) BARREL SHROUD.--The term `barrel shroud' means a shroud that is attached to, or partially or completely encircles, the barrel of a firearm so that the shroud protects the user of the firearm from heat generated by the barrel, but does not include a slide that encloses the barrel, and does not include an extension of the stock along the bottom of the barrel which does not encircle or substantially encircle the barrel.
>
> ``(37) CONVERSION KIT.--The term `conversion kit' means any part or combination of parts designed and intended for use in converting a firearm into a semiautomatic assault weapon, and any combination of parts from which a semiautomatic assault weapon can be assembled if the parts are in the possession or under the control of a person.
>
> ``(38) DETACHABLE MAGAZINE.--The term `detachable magazine' means an ammunition feeding device that can readily be inserted into a firearm.
>
> ``(39) FIXED MAGAZINE.--The term `fixed magazine' means an ammunition feeding device contained in, or permanently attached to, a firearm.
>
> ``(40) FOLDING OR TELESCOPING STOCK.--The term `folding or telescoping stock' means a stock that folds, telescopes, or otherwise operates to reduce the length, size, or any other dimension, or otherwise enhances the concealability, of a firearm.
>
> ``(41) FORWARD GRIP.--The term `forward grip' means a grip located forward of the trigger that functions as a pistol grip.
>
> ``(42) PISTOL GRIP.--The term `pistol grip' means a grip, a thumbhole stock, or any other characteristic that can function as a grip.
>
> ``(43) THREADED BARREL.--The term `threaded barrel' means a feature or characteristic that is designed in such a manner to allow for the attachment of a firearm as defined in section 5845(a) of the National Firearms Act (26 U.S.C. 5845(a)).''.
>
> SEC. 3. BAN OF LARGE CAPACITY AMMUNITION FEEDING DEVICES.
>
> (a) PROHIBITION.--Section 922 of title 18, United States Code, as amended by section 2(a), is amended by adding after subsection (v) the following:
>
> ``(w)(1)(A) Except as provided in subparagraph (B), it shall be unlawful for a person to transfer or possess a large capacity ammunition feeding device.
>
> ``(B) Subparagraph (A) shall not apply to the possession or transfer of any large capacity ammunition feeding device otherwise lawfully possessed in the United States on the date of enactment of this subsection.
>
> ``(2) It shall be unlawful for any person to import or bring into the United States a large capacity ammunition feeding device.
>
> ``(3) This subsection shall not apply to--
>
> ``(A) the manufacture for, transfer to, or possession by the United States or a department or agency of the United States or a State or a department, agency, or political subdivision of a State, or a transfer to or possession by a law enforcement officer employed by such an entity for purposes of law enforcement (whether on or off duty);
>
> ``(B) the transfer to a licensee under title I of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 for purposes of establishing and maintaining an onsite physical protection system and security organization required by Federal law, or possession by an employee or contractor of such licensee onsite for such purposes or off-site for purposes of licensee-authorized training or transportation of nuclear materials; or
>
> ``(C) the manufacture, transfer, or possession of any large capacity ammunition feeding device by a licensed manufacturer or licensed importer for the purposes of testing or experimentation authorized by the Secretary.
>
> ``(4) It shall be unlawful for a licensed manufacturer, licensed importer, or licensed dealer who transfers a large capacity ammunition feeding device that was manufactured on or before the date of enactment of this subsection, to fail to certify to the Attorney General before the end of the 60-day period that begins with the date of the transfer, in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Attorney General, that the device was manufactured on or before the date of enactment of this subsection.''.
>
> (b) DEFINITION OF LARGE CAPACITY AMMUNITION FEEDING DEVICE.--Section 921(a) of title 18, United States Code, as amended by section 2(b), is amended by adding after paragraph (30) the following:
>
> ``(31) The term `large capacity ammunition feeding device'--
>
> ``(A) means a magazine, belt, drum, feed strip, or similar device that has a capacity of, or that can be readily restored or converted to accept, more than 10 rounds of ammunition; but
>
> ``(B) does not include an attached tubular device designed to accept, and capable of operating only with, .22 caliber rimfire ammunition.''.
>
> (c) PENALTY.--Section 924(a)(1)(B) of title 18, United States Code, as amended by section 2(c), is amended by striking ``or (v)'' and inserting ``(v), or (w)''.
>
> (d) IDENTIFICATION MARKINGS FOR LARGE CAPACITY AMMUNITION FEEDING DEVICES.--Section 923(i) of title 18, United States Code, as amended by section 2(d), is amended by adding at the end the following: ``A large capacity ammunition feeding device manufactured after the date of the enactment of this sentence shall be identified by a serial number that clearly shows that the device was manufactured or imported after the effective date of this subsection, and such other identification as the Attorney General may by regulation prescribe.
>
> (e) BAN ON TRANSFER OF SEMIAUTOMATIC ASSAULT WEAPON WITH LARGE CAPACITY AMMUNITION FEEDING DEVICE.--
>
> (1) IN GENERAL.--Section 922 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by inserting at the end the following:
>
> ``(z) It shall be unlawful for any person to transfer any assault weapon with a large capacity ammunition feeding device.''.
>
> (2) PENALTIES.--Section 924(a) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
>
> ``(8) Whoever knowingly violates section 922(z) shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both.
>
> ``(9) Whoever knowingly violates section 922(w)(4) shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.''.
>
> SEC. 4. STUDY BY ATTORNEY GENERAL.
>
> (a) STUDY.--The Attorney General shall investigate and study the effect of this Act and the amendments made by this Act, and in particular shall determine their impact, if any, on violent and drug trafficking crime. The study shall be conducted over a period of 18 months, commencing 12 months after the date of enactment of this Act.
>
> (b) REPORT.--Not later than 30 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the Attorney General shall prepare and submit to Congress a report setting forth in detail the findings and determinations made in the study under subsection (a).
>
> SEC. 5. UNLAWFUL WEAPONS TRANSFERS TO JUVENILES.
>
> Section 922(x) of title 18, United States Code, is amended--
>
> (1) in paragraph (1)--
>
> (A) in subparagraph (B), by striking the period and inserting a semicolon; and
>
> (B) by adding at the end the following:
>
> ``(C) a semiautomatic assault weapon; or
>
> ``(D) a large capacity ammunition feeding device.''; and
>
> (2) in paragraph (2)--
>
> (A) in subparagraph (B), by striking the period and inserting a semicolon; and
>
> (B) by adding at the end the following:
>
> ``(C) a semiautomatic assault weapon; or
>
> ``(D) a large capacity ammunition feeding device.''.
>
> SEC. 6. EFFECTIVE DATE.
>
> This Act and the amendments made by this Act shall take effect on the date of enactment of this Act.
>
>
> Notice that the mini-14 and M1 carbine are also on the list this time around.

posted in filthy bitches gun club - 1 reply

Aeon Flux

pixel_demon — Thu, 18 Aug 2005 20:12:32 GMT

Just in case ya'll haven't seen this one:

http://www.aeonfluxmovie.com/

posted in filthy bitches gun club - 11 replies

No more guns in San Francisco?!

dustin2dust — Fri, 21 Oct 2005 02:06:24 GMT

I just heard they are trying to pass a law to take away people's guns if they live in San Francisco county. If you live there and you love guns vote no on H in November.
To read more go to...
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/gate/archive/2005/09/14/cstillwell.DTL
Pass it on!

posted in filthy bitches gun club - 20 replies

Glock Owners Should See This

Sasquatch — Fri, 21 Oct 2005 02:05:24 GMT

I'm posting this to all three gun tribes that I'm on for obvious reason.

"Speir has documented many instances of kB!s, all of them in the Models 20 and 30-something Glock (.40 S&W, 10mm and .45 ACP). And since the introduction of the Models 30-through-36, there have been incidents of kB!s in the 357 SIG (Models 31, 32 and 33) and the .45 ACP (Models 30 and 36) pistols as well... all with reloaded or remanufactured rounds by most accounts. And until February 2004. Speir had no (as in zero!) confirmed cases of Glock kB!s in the 9 x 19mm (Models 17, 17L, 18, 19, 26 and 34, although there has been one such reasonably detailed anecdotal report), or the .380 ACP/9 X 17mm (Models 25 and 28)."

http://www.thegunzone.com/glock/glock-kb-faq.html

Sas

posted in filthy bitches gun club - 4 replies

cheesecake post

violetblue — Thu, 17 Nov 2005 04:58:28 GMT

way too gratuitous -- and kinda cute -- to pass up sharing:

http://www.iwantbabes.com/galleries/lethallipstick/

totes NSFW, by the way...

posted in filthy bitches gun club - 2 replies

redneck homophobes think its funny

korntee — Fri, 11 Nov 2005 07:47:23 GMT

http://rightwingduck.redstate.org/story/2005/11/9/223645/986

posted in filthy bitches gun club - 8 replies

field trip?

BoyChaos — Wed, 09 Nov 2005 23:17:25 GMT

I am discouraged by the current polital BS. Anyone up for a trip to the range next tuesday or wednesday? (11-15 or 11-16)?

posted in filthy bitches gun club - 5 replies

IF YOU WANT TO KEEP YOUR GUNS JOIN THE NRA

TODDROYALLCASPELL — Thu, 10 Nov 2005 05:09:50 GMT

Yes the NRA is sometimes politically suspect. I hate to vote the NRA line. Could not do Bush. But this is America and money is all that matters. The golden rule. If you want to keep your guns join the NRA they scare the HELL out of the safety nazi gun grabbers. THEY can't protect you so if you can't always carry a gun isn't it nice that the bad guys think you COULD be ? There are more guns than toasters - more guns than telephones in America and NO legislation is ever going to change that. All gun bans do is take away from those who are honest/stupid enough to turn their guns in. The criminals will always be armed. The states with the strictest gun laws have the highest gun homicide rates.

posted in filthy bitches gun club - 1 reply

NRAC Nat Rifle Assoc of Canada

TODDROYALLCASPELL — Thu, 10 Nov 2005 05:34:08 GMT

I signed my Liberal pinko socialist girlfriend up in the NRA. Because I LOVE her. I take her to the range when she is down too. She reports the postman looks at her funny now that she gets the Rifleman.

posted in filthy bitches gun club - 0 replies

spam for women:

Fri, 14 Oct 2005 21:04:16 GMT

http://sanfrancisco.tribe.net/listing/For-the-LADIESAn-amateur-all-male-erotic-revue/san-francisco-ca/8cdf0131-05e6-4b8b-b0ba-f0594f240167?nextpage=http%3A%2F%2Fburlesqueshows.tribe.net%3Fr%3D10513&r=10513

posted in filthy bitches gun club - 0 replies

Vote No on Prop H in SF November 8th

Thu, 06 Oct 2005 19:52:14 GMT

Reprinted with permission from Bill Sappington:

(Below sent to every member of the board of supes and the mayor )

Dear Supervisor Daly,

Proposition H, is nothing but pure political grand standing. And justlike the legislature, you carefully exempt all of yourselves from this, to whit:

"Within the limits of the City and County of San Francisco, no resident of the City and County of San Francisco shall possess any handgun unless required for professional purposes, as enumerated herein. _Specifically,
any City, state or federal employee carrying out the functions of his or her government employment, including *** but not limited to*** peace officers as defined by California Penal Code Section 830 et.seq. and animal control officers may possess a handgun._ Active members of the United States armed forces or the National Guard and security guards, regularly employed and compensated by a person engaged in any lawful business, while actually employed and engaged in protecting and preserving property or life within the scope of his or her employment, may also possess handguns."

( emphasis added by author )

So Mr. Daly, when has your life become more important then mine? By the definition above, you your fellow board members and the mayor can be construed to by city employees "...carrying out the functions of his or her employment..." or for that matter anyone else who is on the city payroll and you guys decide to bless as being worthy of being able to protect their life, property and family.

Your proposal site "176 handgun incidents in San Francisco affected 213 in 1999..." so let me do the math for you:

* Population of San Francisco city and county in 2000 = 776,733

(213 / 776,733) * 100 = .0274 percent.

Yes that is 2 One hundreth's of a percent the population of the entire city of San Francisco was effected by gun violence or expressed _very_ accurately:

0.0274225506 percent.

You further break that down to 176 handgun incidents in San Francisco, so lets look at those number based upon population: (176 / 776,733 ) * 100 = .0226 percent or expressed very accurately:

0.022659009 percent

So based upon those numbers, you intend to deny the right of some 776 thousand people to possess a handgun in their own homes!

Will you take a police officer to the _home_ of Senator Diane Feinstein and _demand_ she hand her handgun over to the officer you brought with you?

You know Mr. Daily, somehow I kind of think she is going to fall into the "...including but not limited to..." clause of your proposition. Mr. Daily, is _her_ life more important then mine?

Will you go to the home of every retired police office who lives in San Francisco and demand any handguns they have? Although the city is not allowed to force handgun owners to register a handgun and therefor you cant get a list and go door to door, I think you can find out where every retired police officer in San Francisco lives because we send them
a check every month.

I was in the military for 10 years, I am quite capable of handling most any kind of weapon ever made competently and with the rules of deadly force uppermost in my mind. And yet, you would deny me a tool to protect myself and my family.

The bans don't work plain and simple. Criminals who want guns will simply continue to buy them out of trunks of cars and nothing will change, all you will have accomplished is to deny law abiding citizens of a tool to protect themselves.

Now personally I think a shotgun is the best home defense tool, but if someone prefers a handgun, it is their business, not yours Mr. Daly.

As history will tell you, the first step of government subjugation of the population is to disarm them. This was true in Germany, The former Soviet Union and elsewhere.

I am a red blooded pretty middle of the road ( politically ) American. I spent 10 years of my life ready to die for my country ( and your young life as well) before you were even in High School, much less a supervisor.

Banning handguns is not the answer to the problem of violence. Making The City more attractive to business and getting better employment is one good way to give people the ability to make a better life for themselves and is a good place to start. Yet sadly the Board of Supervisors enacts law after law that make SF more hostile to business.

Bill Sappington
A Native of SF.

posted in filthy bitches gun club - 2 replies

fetish girls with guns

korntee — Wed, 31 Aug 2005 06:19:46 GMT

http://www.deviantart.com/print/118280/
http://www.deviantart.com/print/100364/

posted in filthy bitches gun club - 5 replies

So, who's the ARMY chick with the SAW

Diavola — Wed, 24 Aug 2005 07:06:26 GMT

http://sanfrancisco.tribe.net/template/pub%2CViewPhoto.vm/context/tribe?page=3&currentoffset=62&parentid=c8818d87-45c2-4070-baee-cf5b0877aada&sortby=newest&rows=24&r=10535

SO, are ya doin' the SAW gunner or is that yours?

posted in filthy bitches gun club - 7 replies

Favorite Gun Songs

FALPhil — Thu, 18 Aug 2005 22:30:05 GMT

Been a while since this was discussed, and I thought I'd bring it up again.

What's your favorite gun song?

Anybody besides me like "Gun Love" by ZZ Top?

posted in filthy bitches gun club - 0 replies

cornershot

korntee — Sun, 14 Aug 2005 07:56:42 GMT

check out the videos

http://www.cornershot.com/

posted in filthy bitches gun club - 1 reply

filthy bitches at burningman?

Mon, 01 Aug 2005 17:24:22 GMT

are any of yáll going? should we organize a get together?
au revoir,
marie-angelique

posted in filthy bitches gun club - 6 replies

A senator tries to stop UN Gun ban

Sasquatch — Mon, 18 Jul 2005 02:33:34 GMT

Hi Y'all. I believe this merits your attention if not action.

Sasquatch

From the Gun Owners of America newsletter;

Gun Owners of America E-Mail Alert
8001 Forbes Place, Suite 102, Springfield, VA 22151
Phone: 703-321-8585 / FAX: 703-321-8408
http://www.gunowners.org

Thursday, July 14, 2005

Pro-gun Senator David Vitter (R-LA) is getting ready to introduce a
bill that would block the United Nations from implementing gun
control measures affecting U.S. citizens.

Entitled the "UN Second Amendment Protection Act of 2005," the bill
does still not have a number, as Sen. Vitter is trying to get
original cosponsors to join him.

Gun owners across America are increasingly victorious in legislative
and elective battles at the local, state and national levels.
Nevertheless, anti-gun internationalists, long burrowed in the UN
headquarters, are planning, with some success, massive international
gun control measures.

This entire week, the UN is holding the second biennial meeting of
States to consider the implementation of the Program of Action to
Prevent, Combat and Eradicate the Illicit Trade in Small Arms and
Light Weapons in All Its Aspects.

Though couched in the flowery rhetoric of protecting victims of
violence, the goal of the conference is nothing short of global gun
control. The rabid gun banners to our north would seem to agree.
"From Canada's perspective.... serious attention should be given to
the regulation of civilian possession of small arms," said Tim
Martin, head of Canada's delegation to the conference.

Sen. Vitter has meticulously documented and highlighted for his
senate colleagues some of the most egregious proposals, including:

* A comprehensive program for worldwide gun control and a total ban
on certain types of firearms;

* The establishment of an international tracking certificate which
would be used to ensure UN monitoring control over the export,
import, transit, stocking, and storage of legal small arms and light
weapons;

* Worldwide record keeping for an indefinite amount of time on the
manufacture, holding and transfer of small arms and light weapons;

* National registries and tracking lists of all legal firearms.

"The U.N. has no business interfering with our Second Amendment
rights guaranteed by our Founding Fathers," Sen. Vitter said.

Much of the UN's agenda was conceived in a 1995 proposal, and then
adopted as a Program of Action in 2001. At that time, then-Under
Secretary of State for Arms Control and International Security John
Bolton led the U.S. opposition to the Program. The United States has
neither signed nor ratified the Program.

Sen. Vitter's bill will prohibit any U.S. funding to the UN unless
the President certifies that the world body "has not taken action to
restrict, attempt to restrict or otherwise adversely infringe upon
the rights of individuals in the United States to possess a firearm
or ammunition."

ACTION: Please contact your two senators and urge them to cosponsor
the Vitter bill. You can visit the Gun Owners Legislative Action
Center at http://www.gunowners.org/activism.htm to send your Senators

a pre-written e-mail message.
----- Pre-written message -----

Dear Senator:

I urge you to contact Senator Vitter's office to cosponsor his draft
legislation entitled, the "UN Second Amendment Protection Act of
2005."

Anti-gun internationalists, long burrowed in the UN headquarters, are
planning, with some success, massive international gun control
measures.

But Sen. Vitter's bill will prohibit any U.S. funding to the UN
unless the President certifies that the world body "has not taken
action to restrict, attempt to restrict or otherwise adversely
infringe upon the rights of individuals in the United States to
possess a firearm or ammunition."

Again, I strongly encourage you to cosponsor this bill. Gun Owners
of America will keep me up-to-date with the cosponsorship status of
this legislation. Thank you.

Sincerely,

posted in filthy bitches gun club - 0 replies

New East Coast Filthy Bitch Gun Lover...

Sun, 19 Jun 2005 14:11:39 GMT

Hello All...
Just wanted to say Hi to all and introduce myself...

I enjoy shooting Handguns and Long guns as well as collecting...
I have my own 100yd range and am working on a 250yd one that should be done soon...
So if there are any Filthy Bitches who would Like to come by n do some shooting just let me know...

People always ask me if I own guns to shoot people ....
I always reply that I own and carry guns to shoot back...
Besides... If Good People like us didn't carry guns... then only BAD Guys would have them...and that would SUCK...

Love and Good Vibes to ALL...
Shoot straight and often...
Your Fireman
Bobby
8-)

posted in filthy bitches gun club - 9 replies

16 year old female sniper on NPR

violetblue — Tue, 03 May 2005 23:16:58 GMT

wow, amazing:

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4628656

(thanks, Tony Comstock, for the link!)

posted in filthy bitches gun club - 7 replies

hot pic; hotter gun

violetblue — Fri, 24 Jun 2005 19:01:26 GMT

check this out -- perfect for summer:

http://www.lonedarkknight.com/Babes-Guns/TANAUGUSTLG.JPG

anyone know if that's a real gun, and if so, where I can get one? :) I want to be the deadly Barbie!

posted in filthy bitches gun club - 6 replies

Woo Hoo! Tura's coming to SF!

ninaeleanor — Sun, 19 Jun 2005 22:40:05 GMT

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2005/06/17/DDGTID9BDD1.DTL

posted in filthy bitches gun club - 3 replies

Stop SB 357

simon_p — Tue, 21 Jun 2005 12:34:35 GMT

SB 357 (Dunn) is a bill that would require individual serial numbers to be etched on each and every handgun bullet sold in CA, down to and including .22LR.

The bill PASSED from the Senate and is now in the Assembly Public Safety Committee.

MAKE PHONE CALLS, WRITE LETTERS AND SEND EMAILS AND FAXES EVEN IF YOU DO NOT LIVE IN CA. IT IS PROVEN THAT LEGISLATION SPAWNED IN THIS COMMUNIST HELLHOLE WILL SPREAD TO OTHER STATES.

CONTACT INFO FOR THE ASSEMBLY PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE: TELL THEM TO OPPOSE SB 357!!!!!!

Mark Leno, Chair Dem-13 (916) 319-2013 Assemblymember.leno@assembly.ca.gov

Jay La Suer, Vice Chair Rep-77 (916) 319-2077 Assemblymember.Lasuer@assembly.ca.gov

Rebecca Cohn Dem-24 (916) 319-2024 Assemblymember.Cohn@assembly.ca.gov

Mervyn M. Dymally Dem-52 (916) 319-2052 Assemblymember.dymally@assembly.ca.gov

Jackie Goldberg Dem-45 (916) 319-2045 Assemblymember.Goldberg@assembly.ca.gov

Todd Spitzer Rep-71 (916) 319-2071 Assemblymember.spitzer@assembly.ca.gov

Committee phone: (916) 319-3744

Committee Email public.safety@assembly.ca.gov

posted in filthy bitches gun club - 3 replies

Lego gun babes

violetblue — Wed, 15 Jun 2005 03:09:33 GMT

Love the schoolgirl, too:

http://www.boingboing.net/2005/06/14/chicks_and_guns_in_l.html

posted in filthy bitches gun club - 4 replies

D.E.B.S.

korntee — Sun, 12 Jun 2005 20:42:14 GMT

http://www.sonypictures.com/cthe/debs/site/index.html

posted in filthy bitches gun club - 3 replies

Shooting in Tucson

Shooter-666 — Thu, 09 Jun 2005 23:56:36 GMT

ANyone up to do some shooting in Tucson? I don't have my AK with me, but have a few other things. . . Drove up Lopez Pass last weekend in the Santa Rita Mountains. Pretty remote. . .

posted in filthy bitches gun club - 0 replies

Walther P22

DukeSF — Tue, 03 May 2005 03:52:45 GMT

If you live in California expect a letter from the DOJ.

posted in filthy bitches gun club - 7 replies

Xeni goes bang!

violetblue — Mon, 02 May 2005 18:32:06 GMT

My friend Xeni just went to a range and learned how to shoot -- check out the great pictures and videos (her Flickr pics have descriptions of her experience in detail). She loved the Glock the most.

http://www.boingboing.net/2005/05/01/xeni_get_your_gun.html

posted in filthy bitches gun club - 1 reply

New Proposed Legislation - check it out!

Wed, 20 Apr 2005 20:55:14 GMT

yikes!

http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/bill/asm/ab_0051-0100/ab_98_bill_20050317_amended_asm.html

posted in filthy bitches gun club - 1 reply

In Recent gun news (the last week)

Sasquatch — Sun, 01 May 2005 19:18:04 GMT

Last week a bill that would require ammunition manufacturers to stamp serial numbers on all handgun ammo and retailers to collect ID info via driver's license for ammo sales began moving through the legislature. It is sponsored by that enemy of private firearm ownership, the California attorney general Bill Lockyer [may he fry in hell]. The bill passed the senate Public Safety Commitee on a 4-2 vote after a very brief hearing. The bill is co-authored by the senate leader Dan Peralta D-Oakland [what IS it with the SF Bay Area?] and Sen. Joe Dunn D-Garden Grove. The guvernator reportedly has "no position" on the bill.

"The technology now exists to laser-cut each bullet with a serial number, said Sen. Joseph Dunn, D-Garden Grove, who is carrying the bill. Police would immediately be able to trace who purchased bullets used in crimes. Purchasers would pay up to a halfpenny per bullet to fund record-keeping by the state Department of Justice on every handgun-caliber bullet made or sold in California. Vendors would pay up to $50 a year to register. Rifle ammunition would be exempted, though some calibers are used in both handguns and long guns."

""We'll solve a lot of crimes if this becomes law," said Attorney General Bill Lockyer, who supported the bill. "This proposal is kind of like DNA science applied to ballistics."

"He acknowledged criminals could find ways around the law, but said milk, medicine, soda cans and most other things sold in stores have identification numbers. "Why not bullets?" he said."

[Uh let's see, controlling and tracking ammo sales is infringing on the 2nd amendment which does not protect milk, medicine and soda cans for a start.]

and MOST interestingly..
"Lawrence Keane, general counsel of the Sporting Arms and Ammunition Manufacturers' Institute Inc., said American manufacturers produce 8 billion bullets a year, 15 million a day. They would have to either stop selling in California or rebuild ammunition plants at a cost of hundred of millions of dollars, he said, disputing far lower cost estimates by proponents."

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1391803/posts

In other gun news the US Supreme court ruled over Bush administration objections that people convicted of crimes overseas can still own guns in the US. The court decided that US law which prohibits felons who have been convicted in "any court" from owning guns only applies to crimes committed in the US and against US laws.

WHY is the Bush administration [of all people] trying to do this? Talk about schizophrenic. Next thing you know they'll be calling for prosecution of US servicemembers in the world court : ).

Sasquatch

posted in filthy bitches gun club - 0 replies

9mm any favs?

Amy — Mon, 04 Apr 2005 06:30:36 GMT

I'm looking into getting a new 9mm. I was wondering if any of you ladies have any favs. I have very small hands. i want one for personal defense. I already have a 22. So far the top of my list is the Sig 239 But I was also looking at maybe testing out the HK P2000. Any others I should look into?

Also what do you really think 9mm or 40 for stopping power. And how easy is it to load your own amo?

-thanks
amy

posted in filthy bitches gun club - 25 replies

hello and... anyone shot a baretta?

ladyuberbabe — Mon, 07 Mar 2005 22:17:10 GMT

first, the lady uberbabe says hello. please consider this my first post because, well, it is.

i spent a bit of time in the middle east in the mid90s, and was introduced to the baretta. ahem. a very fine little gun. a lady's gun, a silly boy i dated back then told me. i'm wondering if anyone else has used this gun and if so, what you think of it. i'm in the market for something sleek and special for target practice. and no, that doesn't include shooting little bigots. but in my quiet dreams, it could. ; >

posted in filthy bitches gun club - 26 replies

sin city

korntee — Thu, 07 Apr 2005 03:36:19 GMT

http://www.sincitythemovie.com/flash/flash.html

posted in filthy bitches gun club - 8 replies

How about a filthy bitches outing - April 18th?

Wed, 06 Apr 2005 21:38:42 GMT

Hey, how about an outing to Jackson Arms ladies night, say Monday April 18th? How late are they open?

We could do some plinking, then head to the Death Guild for some 12 yr old Scotch, and check out the 'chicks with guns' calender.

xxx,
marie-angelique

posted in filthy bitches gun club - 6 replies

San Francisco legislation pending to outlaw private fireams ownership?

Sun, 20 Mar 2005 01:48:34 GMT

OK, I got an email on a newsgroup I am on that warned of legislation someone is trying to get for San Francisco that would mean that all gun owners would have to turn in their arms....then I lost it in the plethora of email I get every day....

Has anyone here heard of this? or have any details? or know which elected official we need to write to stop this?

Any info is appreciated,
thanks,
marie-angelique

posted in filthy bitches gun club - 12 replies

The Main Pic

#include — Tue, 12 Apr 2005 15:04:02 GMT

Anyone have a high resolution version of it?

posted in filthy bitches gun club - 1 reply

not a gun, but SO SEXY!

violetblue — Sun, 27 Mar 2005 08:28:26 GMT

http://www.kaktuz.com/1485-Veronica_Zemanova_Firing_Flamethrower.html

I just worry about nip burns!

posted in filthy bitches gun club - 4 replies

packin' heat in the bathroom?

violetblue — Fri, 25 Mar 2005 19:05:38 GMT

http://www.boingboing.net/2005/03/25/pistol_hairdryer.html

posted in filthy bitches gun club - 3 replies

Goat hunting in Swaziland

Swaz — Wed, 23 Mar 2005 03:29:20 GMT

"It's that time of year again in Swaziland -- late January through March -- when the nation is gripped by an insatiable lust for having sex and stealing goats. Visitors traveling down country roads are apt to see either couples fornicating right out in the open or police chasing down a wild-eyed livestock thief. Or both."

http://dir.salon.com/sex/world/2001/02/21/swazi/index.html

Their aphrodesiac drink sure does sound fun.

Swaz

posted in filthy bitches gun club - 0 replies

Anyone own a Springfield XD pistol?

PBR — Mon, 21 Mar 2005 01:50:36 GMT

I was checking these out at the gun show and I think I found my next sidearm.

http://www.springfield-armory.com/prod-xdpstl-sub-compact.shtml

http://www.springfield-armory.com/images/xd-pistol/XD9812Large.jpg

I like the .40 XD9812 OD model. Does anyone on here own one or has shot one? lets hear about it.

posted in filthy bitches gun club - 0 replies

Gun Shop Recommendation

Roxane — Mon, 14 Mar 2005 21:52:49 GMT

I'm looking to BUY my first gun (been shooting a long time, but finally turning into a gun owner) and would like a recommendation for a gun shop in the Bayeria. I will be buying a .22 carbine and possibly also a .45 pistol.

I will be in Sacramento this Wednesday, but I live in SF.

Thanks!

posted in filthy bitches gun club - 9 replies

Got Training?

Wed, 16 Mar 2005 19:07:48 GMT

Popping the lid off a thousand round ammo can of .223 and blasting the hell out of sray beer cans, toasters, abandoned cars... is definitely an important part of anyone's firearms experience.
Shooting pumpkins with a .338 or 12ga shotgun will also bring it's own special kind of rewards to the lives of the responsible gun owner.

Something to level with though is that almost everyone who owns one has somewhere in their agenda the possibility of personal defense.
When the shit hits the fan and you need to use it, do you know what to do?
What if it jams? What if your hands are cold or numb? Know where you're gonna try to hit the bastard? Know if you have the skill or if your equipment has the ability to take care of the problem?

Professional training is worth (by a longshot) more than the face value of the money used to pay for it.
Places like Gunsite, Thunder Ranch, Front Site, Massas Ayoob's Leathal Force Institute, The Firearms Academy of Seattle, there are more, but I list these particular places as the example to follow for comparison.

That NRA handgun course ain't gonna cut it.
It'll get you the card or the hunting license, but don't think knowing how to load the thing and wail on a target is gonna save your ass if things go horribly wrong and you need to stop an attacker to save your life.

I've trained beside FBI, DEA, NRC, army, navy, agencies that weren't allowed to be named, Moms, librarians, cops, champion firearms competitors, hookers, even a couple of hot whities who lived in El Salvador and needed to protect theirsleves from the occasional bad neighbor.
Everyone I've trained with came away from the experience that they'd been lucky so far that they'd either never needed to defend themselves with a firearm, or had found a new understanding of what is or what aint when it comes to dealing with the possibility of a gunfight.

Something else to note is that -everyone- I've ever trained with was left with the gravely grounding sense that a gunfight is the last place in the world they'd ever want to be and would do anything to avoid having to go there.
For what it's worth, those people are likely to be the most prepared and most feared of the millions of possible opponents in a gun battle and in the unthinkable event would also likely be the ones left when the smoke cleared.

On the lighter side of things, after a course at a good training outfit, you're gonna leave knowing exactly what the hell you know about gun handling and will without a doubt be a better shot and much less of a hazard to those around you.
You'll be a better gun handler and shooting for fun or sport, even hunting for that matter, will be much more rewarding.

I've seen certificates for classes at Front Site selling for about $250 lately, from time to time you'll find promotions like that where you can get into a course for a greatly reduced rate (so long as it's your first class, usually), it's worth it to at least look into.

What's your training?
Do you know if you can park a .45 slug in the eye of that bastard who has your daughter by the neck, when you're stressed and tired, in the falling light of dusk?

I do.

--John

posted in filthy bitches gun club - 13 replies

cool Barbie gun

violetblue — Sun, 20 Feb 2005 22:58:01 GMT

This totally rocks:

http://www.gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/weapons/from-the-barbie-mekong-delta-playset-033428.php

Anyone know where to get one?

posted in filthy bitches gun club - 5 replies

moviebadgirls.com

korntee — Thu, 17 Mar 2005 15:10:17 GMT

http://www.moviebadgirls.com/index.html

I don't know if this has already been posted

posted in filthy bitches gun club - 0 replies

A good source for a replacement shotgun stock?

PBR — Wed, 09 Feb 2005 09:07:29 GMT

Does anyone know of a good source for a replacement stock for an old-school Remington 1100 12-gauge shotgun?

posted in filthy bitches gun club - 2 replies

lethal lipstick

violetblue — Tue, 15 Mar 2005 02:23:57 GMT

new site of hot babes and guns! OMG!!!!

http://www.lethallipstick.com/

posted in filthy bitches gun club - 3 replies

Any of you...

JamaicanSteve — Fri, 11 Mar 2005 19:36:21 GMT

...filthy bitches/bastards out there shooting or have shot a 338 ultra mag? what do you think, do ya like it or no?

cheers~
Jamaican Steve

posted in filthy bitches gun club - 4 replies

a good one

violetblue — Mon, 07 Mar 2005 04:53:49 GMT

here's a great pic:

http://www.juergenspecht.com/galleries/?number=88&page=1&photo=4#photo

posted in filthy bitches gun club - 3 replies

pussy shooter

Tue, 01 Mar 2005 07:45:05 GMT

http://losangeles.tribe.net/template/pub%2CViewPhoto.vm/context/pcard?page=2&currentoffset=9&parentid=98e0215e-78e7-47c7-b548-fbed54713f63&sortby&rows&r=10025

posted in filthy bitches gun club - 0 replies

"the unknown soldier"

violetblue — Mon, 14 Feb 2005 18:51:34 GMT

has some serious firepower (and a shaving cream bra)...

http://www.nowthatsfuckedup.com/bbs/ftopic11216.html

posted in filthy bitches gun club - 13 replies

Pussies: Armed and dangerous

Swaz — Fri, 18 Feb 2005 02:54:37 GMT

Okay you filthy bitches: Who's gonna be the first to go out and arm your snatch?

http://coalitionforguncontrol.org/south_africa3.htm

Coming soon to a gunstore-gynecologist near you.

Swaz

posted in filthy bitches gun club - 4 replies

Death Guild girls with guns calander

deathguild — Sat, 08 Jan 2005 20:44:27 GMT

San Franciscos longest running goth/industrial club is proud to announce its 2005 calendar.
Local alternative girls with a fine selection of firearms it is now ready to be picked up at Death Guild on Monday the 10 or can be purchased through our website shortly there after. www.deathguild.com
I'm uploading a teaser to the photo page on filthy bitches
hope to see you

Decay

posted in filthy bitches gun club - 4 replies

check this out

Wed, 09 Feb 2005 09:03:04 GMT

http://sanfrancisco.tribe.net/template/pub%2CViewPhoto.vm/context/pcard?page=3&currentoffset=17&parentid=dba0e51c-2984-4d08-84c7-98eb5c584e60&sortby&rows&r=10535

posted in filthy bitches gun club - 4 replies

More pics

Red — Fri, 04 Feb 2005 06:53:26 GMT

Took the little lady out shooting this week.
Had to take some pics to commemorate
popping her gun cherry.Check em out

Red

posted in filthy bitches gun club - 11 replies

couple photos for you

th0rn — Fri, 04 Feb 2005 05:43:38 GMT

finally got something worthy, first since you have Baroness, i figure i got to add scarlett, its a great photo, an unreleased ultra hotty figure with upgraded MP5, and a small shot of the figure you could get in stores for comparision. (you'll see why this one never hit the stores)

now i couldnt just put up that photo, so i had to find a model. i will be finding more also. heheh. Amber has owned much better guns, sorry this is just a little one i let her borrow for a minute.
need to find a better setting for these pics
anyway, ill throw them in the gallery, hopefully more soon.

posted in filthy bitches gun club - 0 replies

new member welcome

violetblue — Sat, 18 Dec 2004 02:13:39 GMT

hey -- there are a bunch of new members here, as Tribe finally fixed their "allow new members" function. it had been broken for four weeks, so my apologies for the looong wait. I did decline a few guys who wanted to join "to get some," no kidding. so hey newbies -- introduce yourselves if you want to. please refer to earlier posts about what kind of photos to post in the photo album, and how much we love powerful bitches with guns, shooting stuff, and all that frothy goodness.

welcome!

posted in filthy bitches gun club - 14 replies

corsets n guns

violetblue — Thu, 20 Jan 2005 03:22:55 GMT

this amazing corset site has various lovely models posing with guns... very sexy:

http://amf.addr.com/factory/kali-ring.html

http://amf.addr.com/gallery1.html

http://amf.addr.com/gallery3.html

posted in filthy bitches gun club - 4 replies

but what about the children!

.zegnatronicalled — Fri, 28 Jan 2005 22:09:59 GMT

http://www.nra-kkk.org/

posted in filthy bitches gun club - 4 replies

filthy bitchs answer to hippy drum circles

Thu, 27 Jan 2005 06:09:18 GMT

gun circles

posted in filthy bitches gun club - 11 replies

stolen Truck- mine, please look for!!!

ninaeleanor — Tue, 18 Jan 2005 00:00:03 GMT

Hi friends- please, please, please... keep an eye out for my truck, in the southern and bayshore areas of SF... or whrever else vehicles may be recovered that are stolen from my gentrified whitey-tightie side of Potrero Hill.

I have a "Listing" posted, that describes my baby in detail. This, plus my bike, both in the same year, too goddamn much. The bike I made into my baby myself, whereas the truck, I just paid a hellofalot for, and really don't want to have to continue paying-on if in the hands of some asshole wanker theif monger.

Thanks,
- nina

posted in filthy bitches gun club - 4 replies

New year's day celebration - shooting!

XXX — Tue, 28 Dec 2004 01:01:07 GMT

Ok, for all you bay area folks, Let's try another meetup at Jackson on New year's day. As i imagine most of is will be indulging in some major hedonism friday night, let's put it nice and late, say 4:00?

Let's get a rollcall together...

Happy new year's
cheers

posted in filthy bitches gun club - 1 reply

AAAAGE! Holey SHit!

ninaeleanor — Thu, 16 Dec 2004 02:52:18 GMT

Totally illegalizing handguns in San Francisco. Not like I'd citizenly relinquish mine, but... eeek! Yikes! Ay Caramba!

Something's gotta be done to promote more thoughtful discussion of this issue to hopefully encourage more holistic and less ignoramis proposals of action, than this shit! Oy! I wanna find a mountaintop and scream!

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/news/archive/2004/12/15/state1859EST0145.DTL

posted in filthy bitches gun club - 14 replies